Huaimo Chen <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Everyone,
My comments are inline below with prefix [HC].
Best Regards,
- IETF 101 (Mar 2018) - Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHmT4ytMn4w&list=PLC86T-6ZTP5j_HaBNdfPbgxGIp22cnaWS - Minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-lsr-00 - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-02 presented (1 author). at IETF 101 - Generally well received. - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) presented. - Serious problems immediately found during presentation -- not fully baked. [HC] All the problems have been resolved in our latest draft. Some people indicated that the distributed solution is better than the centralized one. In addition, on the LSR mailing list, some people said that the distributed solution is more practical.
Great. And it makes sense to have a document dedicated to your distributed algorithm solution. That is the proposal I just put forward.
- draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05 having come first, being well written
and not
specifying a distributed algorithm (merely allowing for one) is the
correct vehicle
to adopt as a base document.
[HC] Coming first and being well written are important. However, technical
merits or advantages are at least equally important.
Technical merits are very important, and we (the WG) should have discussions about and make any changes that might be needed to the centralized solution document -- once we adopt one. It only makes sense to adopt the original centralized solution work for working on the centralized solution -- especially since it's well written, and it came first. Thanks, Chris.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
