Support the proposal.
Regards, - Naiming > On Feb 1, 2019, at 4:25 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > Summary of where we are at with dynamic flooding reduction: > > - We have a well written original work that came first and described the > problems as well as a TLVs to allow for a centralized solution > (draft-li-dyanmic-flooding). We do not need to standardize the centralized > algorithm. > > - A small change to this work allowed for distributed algorithms and for > outside work on distributed algorithms to continue in parallel. > > - We have another original work that started primarily as a distributed > algorithm > (draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction) > > - Finally we also have: > - Cross-pollination of ideas. > - Failed attempts at merging. > - An authors list "Arms-Race". > > Moving forward: > > - During IETF 103 I proposed we have no conflict if we: > > 1) adopt draft-li-lsr-dyanmic-flooding as the base WG document. > 2) have authors of draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction work on a distributed > algorithm as they started with. > > - Acee agreed during the meeting (as chair) that this was the best way > forward. We had some agreement form the floor as well. > > - Any good ideas regarding the distribution of a centralized topology can be > debated and added (with appropriate attribution) to the base document after > we adopt one. > > - This is what happens when we adopt a document as WG work, we work on it. > > - The original authors of the distributed solution can continue to work on > their distributed algorithm in a separate document which would also need > standardization. > > Does anyone see a serious problem with this path forward? > > Thanks, > Chris & Acee. > LSR Chairs. > > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes: > >> We've had the authors of the individual conflicting drafts take a shot at >> merging their work. >> >> This has failed. >> >> Here is the full history (which I also summarized during IETF103 as well). I >> will send a second email discussing this. >> >> - Jan 2, 2018 Publication: draft-li-dynamic-flooding and >> drfat-li-dynamic-flooding-isis >> published centralized solution. >> >> - Mar 5, 2018 Publication: draft-cc-isis-flooding-reduction and >> draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction >> published distributed solution. >> - mention of centralized solution asserting it is not good choice. >> >> - IETF 101 (Mar 2018) >> - Video: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHmT4ytMn4w&list=PLC86T-6ZTP5j_HaBNdfPbgxGIp22cnaWS >> - Minutes: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-lsr-00 >> - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-02 presented (1 author). at IETF 101 >> - Generally well received. >> - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) presented. >> - Serious problems immediately found during presentation -- not fully >> baked. >> >> - Mar 18, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-03 published (1 author) >> - Mar 27, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04 published (1 author) >> - Apr 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-01 revised >> - Jun 28, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 published (2 authors) >> - *SMALL CHANGE TO SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHM*. >> - Does not specify distributed algorithm only how to indicate one in use, >> small change. >> >> - Jul 2, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 published >> >> - IETF 102 (Jul 14, 2018) >> - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 presented. >> - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 presented. >> >> - Sep 12, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-03 (4 authors) >> - *LARGE CHANGE ADDS NEW CENTRALIZED SOLUTION*. >> >> - Sep 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-04 (4 authors) >> >> - Oct 21, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-00 and -01 (5 authors) >> >> - IETF 103 (Nov 3, 2018) >> >> - Chairs give direction >> >> - draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05 having come first, being well written >> and not >> specifying a distributed algorithm (merely allowing for one) is the >> correct vehicle >> to adopt as a base document. >> >> - Distributed algorithm work (the original basis for >> draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction) >> should continue as a separate document form the base which would thus >> we have no >> conflicts. >> >> - In the meantime the authors try and merge work, this fails. >> >> - Dec 3, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 (7 authors) >> >> - Dec 10, 2018 draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) >> >> - Jan 7, 2019 draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 (8 authors) > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
