Hi, Susan:
It seems better to introduce one new draft to introduce your “virtual topology” 
solution, especially the control plane and forward plane behavior, how it 
interact with the deployed level 1/2 solutions.

I think to improve the convergence performance in large network such as 5G/IP 
RAN network is one attractive topic but we need to select/make the solutions 
being deployed easily and smoothly.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Aug 16, 2019, at 22:23, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ajun:
>  
> I’ll let Tony provide his answer to your question.   Let me provide an 
> alternate topology that your example might fit into
>  
> draft-hares-lsr-grid-ring-convergence-00.txt describes a problem with IGP 
> convergence for the grid-ring phone topology that may be deployed in some 5G 
> networks.  One way to solve the convergence problem is to provide an 
> alternate fast convergence topology that uses hierarchy to provide shorter 
> paths through the Grid portion of the grid-ring topology. 
>  
> Suppose in this topology, the regular IGP (ISIS) algorithm keeps the 2 level 
> hierarchy. 
>  
> The alternate fast convergence algorithm uses a multiple level hierarchy in 
> order to provide faster convergence.   The multiple levels provide 
> “short-cut” paths for the IGP in a virtual topology in the Grid topology.  As 
> discussions on this forum have indicated, the fast convergence topologies run 
> in parallel with the normal IGP forwarding providing an alternate forwarding 
> path.   If you would like me to explain how the hierarchy can provide faster 
> convergence for a grid, I can provide that explanation to you (online or 
> offline).    
>  
> Forwarding on the node needs to handle the multiple IGP routes.  Since  the 
> fast convergence topologies provide early notification of forwarding problems 
> in the normal IGP, the forward processing in the nodes might check this 
> alternate topology for unknown routes.   Other ways of merging the two 
> forwarding RIBs generated by the two IGPs also exist.  Since (per your 
> example) R1 and R7 since the this link would be known to the regular IGP, the 
> traffic could flow over this path.
>  
> I hope this helps…
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
> PS – I would refresh the draft-hares-lsr-grid-ring-convergence-00.txt, but 
> the draft submission seems to have a problem this morning.  This draft is 
> still a rough draft. Some feedback I received indicates I should update 
> sections. 
>  
>  
> From: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 2:48 AM
> To: [email protected]; 'Robert Raszuk'
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [Lsr] 答复: LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - 
> draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
>  
> Hi, Tony:
>  
> Would you like to elaborate this in more detail to show how you design the 
> control plane hierarchically but the traffic can be transported horizontally? 
> Let’s consider the following graph:
>  
> <image001.png>
> If, as you stated,  we connect R1 and R7 via one link(although we will not do 
> so, if we design the network hierarchically), how you flood the link 
> information hierarchically but let the traffic between the two connected L1 
> area bypass the L2 area?
>  
>  
> Best Regards.
>  
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>  
>  
>  
> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected]
> 发送时间: 2019年8月15日 23:37
> 收件人: Robert Raszuk
> 抄送: [email protected]; Aijun Wang
> 主题: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - 
> draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
>  
>  
> Hi Robert,
>  
>  
> 
> > The hierarchical arrangement of the control plane does NOT imply that the 
> > data plane is necessarily hierarchical.  
>  
> Since Aijun posted his question I was trying to think of such model, but 
> failed. 
>  
> While it is easy to envision this with DV protocols say BGP - do you have any 
> pointer to a link state protocol architecture where data plane is non 
> hierarchical (links do not belong to upper levels) while control plane used 
> traverses multiple levels ? 
>  
>  
> Consider any topology where two peer areas intersect.  At the intersection, 
> traffic can transition between the areas without entering the parent level..
>  
> While I’m at it, I should also point out that the existence of hierarchy for 
> the control plane does not mandate its use. This is another tool in the 
> toolbox. Use the right tool for the job at hand.
>  
> Tony
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to