Robert,
On 26/11/2021 15:06, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Peter,
again, if you use option 2. There are way too many networks without it.
There is even more networks without PUA/PULSE today. Should that be a
factor ?
the solution should not depend on any particular deployment of the
overlay protocol.
In summary, we need something that works independent of the BGP design
and also works outside of BGP.
Really ? Is that the requirement that the solution provided MUST not use
BGP ?
for me the solution ideally should work for with any overlay protocol.
Please kindly describe a full practical deployment scenario where PULSE
helps when BGP is not used at all in the network for distributing
service reachability.
I have explained that several times to you. There are SP networks
running the services on top of p2p IP sec tunnels for example, with no BGP.
OSPF and ISIS are *link state* protocols. You are asking to extend them
to carry *node state* now. Specifically just to carry the UP -> DOWN
transitions of a node state and moreover in an ephemeral fashion.
no, I'm only talking about the prefix unrechability. Something that link
state protocols advertise happily today.
thanks,
Peter
Thx,
R,
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
