Gunter - In regards to:
> Anyway, my point was that draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv may benefit to call- > out subTLVs that by normative reference can only exist one time, in one > place, like for example the flex-algo FAD. > I believe this is out of scope for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv. As clearly stated in the draft, the goal is: "The intent of this document is to clarify the situation by explicitly defining the use of multiple instances of TLVs as the mechanism for scaling TLV contents, except where explicitly prohibited." Any issues specific to a particular TLV/sub-TLV codepoint are out of scope and should be addressed (if need be) in the document which defines the code point. Les _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
