Gunter The use case for SRLG is only related to RSVP-TE FRR protection is my understanding.
However, Flex Algo is only applicable to SR forwarding plane SR-MPLS and SRv6? Correct? RSVP-TE FRR SRLG protection application can be used in parallel to SR-MPLS or SRv6 but in that case they would be 3 different ASLA apps if used on the same link. For SR-MPLS, SR forwarding plane you could use RSVP-TE SRLG protection or SR-TE protection schemes. I don’t think the RSVP-TE FRR SRLG protection would apply to SR-TE protection to use the concept of SRLG with SR-MPLS with Flex Algo or would it apply. Kind Regards Gyan On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 1:03 PM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter, > > the combination is the (a) problem and that will be fixed. We are talking > problem (b) only now. > > > > Ah, my apologies, I was unclear on the applicability of your statements. > > > I'm not trying under-specify how to deal with overflow - we need to > specify it, no disagreement there. > > > > I look forward to seeing a proposal. I propose allowing multiple FAD and > concatenation of the contents. > > > What I'm trying to see of we need to support the "merge" at FAD sub-TLV > level. > > > > I’ll agree that that’s lower priority. I think we should, as a matter of > completeness. > > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
