Hi Peter,
> I would prefer to address the "else clause" in a following way: > > a) any FAD sub-TLV MUST only appear once in a the FAD definition for a given > algorithm from a given source > > b) in case the FAD sub-TLV appear multiple times, the values in the sub-TLV > in the first occurrence in the lowest numbered LSP from a given source MUST > be preferred. > > > Above does not support the "merge" of the values from multiple FAD sub-TLVs, > but as we all agree that is unlikely a requirement. So, you’re in favor of mandating that FlexAlgo has fixed limitations on the scale and complexity of its definitions? Will you be taking the phone calls from our irate customers? Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
