Agreed with the points Les made, and I support progressing this document. Thanks, Yingzhen
> On Jun 10, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I support progressing this document. > Changes are straightforward/non-controversial and have no impact on the > operation of the protocol - no reason we should not expedite this. > > Les > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps >> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:48 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; lsr- >> [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: [Lsr] WG last call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-00 >> >> Given the simplicity of this document and having received no objections or >> edits prior to or during the adoption call we'll be moving it immediately to >> WGLC... >> >> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Jun 19th, 2022, for: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology/ >> >> Authors, >> >> Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. >> >> Thanks, >> Chris. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
