Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your support and comments. We’ll address these in the next revision.
Thanks, Acee From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:30 AM To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG last call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-00 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:30 AM Hi WG, I support progressing this towards publication. Some comments - - The header and main body claim that 7 RFCs are being updated whereas the abstract and introduction only cite two. - It is good to add an informational reference for inclusive language in the introduction -- may be NISTIR8366 (which is referred to in the IESG statement on inclusive language) Thanks! Dhruv On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 3:25 PM Christian Hopps <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Given the simplicity of this document and having received no objections or edits prior to or during the adoption call we'll be moving it immediately to WGLC... This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Jun 19th, 2022, for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology/ Authors, Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. Thanks, Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
