IANA, Please add the AC-Bit as documented in Section 13.3 to the early codepoint allocations associated with this draft.
Thanks, Acee From: Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 11:54 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Cc: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, lsr <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Request for early allocation for pending IANA allocation for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions Hi Acee/Chris, Now that the WGLC is done for this document, would it be a good time to request for early allocation for the pending item (OSPFv3 PrefixOption)? Please refer: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07#section-13.3 Thanks, Ketan On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:11 AM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The Working Group Last Call (WGLC) has completed. There is more than sufficient support for publication. As result of the WGLC discussion, there have been some changes and these reflected in the -07 version. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Please review the changes resulting from the WGLC discussion. Note that the locator TLV will now use the PrefixOptions field common to other OSPFv3 LSAs advertising prefixes and will contain the Anycast (AC-bit). This change is reflected in sections 6 and 7.1. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM To: lsr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address) As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call, ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are implementations. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ Thanks, Acee & Chris
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
