Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your review and feedback. Will incorporate your suggestions in the upcoming update.
Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:54 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I support WG LC. It is in good shape! > > It might be a good idea to include some text (perhaps in the appendix) on > why a new LSA is used for SRv6 Locator LSA. Any reviewer and future reader > would wonder why this decison was made. > > BTW, do expand LSA on first use. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:47 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call, >> ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The >> extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The >> corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are >> implementations. >> >> >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Acee & Chris >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >> >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
