Hi Acee/Chris, Now that the WGLC is done for this document, would it be a good time to request for early allocation for the pending item (OSPFv3 PrefixOption)?
Please refer: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07#section-13.3 Thanks, Ketan On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:11 AM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > The Working Group Last Call (WGLC) has completed. There is more than > sufficient support for publication. As result of the WGLC discussion, there > have been some changes and these reflected in the -07 version. > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 > > > > Please review the changes resulting from the WGLC discussion. Note that > the locator TLV will now use the PrefixOptions field common to other OSPFv3 > LSAs advertising prefixes and will contain the Anycast (AC-bit). This > change is reflected in sections 6 and 7.1. > > > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > > > *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" > <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM > *To: *lsr <[email protected]> > *Cc: *"[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > *Subject: *[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" > - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address) > > > > As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call, > ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The > extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The > corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are > implementations. > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > Acee & Chris > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
