From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> Sent: 20 April 2023 17:21
Tom - https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml At the very top it says: "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" <tp< John, Les Thank you for that, The URL does take me to just that but scrolling down the IANA pages, I see it not; looking at the source, I see <tr class="iana-protocol-group"> <td colspan=3>IS-IS</td> </tr> which is what I see on the screen, no other title no notes, no references, nothing but that is for another (web browser) day. Returning to my Obsessive-Compulsive review of the I-D: - the IANA registry has references to RFC8919 even for the registries created by rfc8919bis. Should all the references be updated since the bis obsoletes 8919? IANA may need telling to do this in my experience. 7.2 the I S - I S "TLV Codepoints Registry". I see it in the 'I S - I S Top-Level TLV Codepoints' registry 7.3 IANA has created a new registry titled "Sub-sub-TLV Codepoints for Application-Specific Link Attributes" under the "IS-IS TLV lacks the initial I S-I S which given the nature of LSR and he number of registries I think significant also, the IANA page has 17 temporary assignment flex-algo-bw-con which seems an issue of timing and procedure as to where it should be mentioned 7.4 Likewise, the IANA page has bit 3 Flexible Algorithm RFC9350 which the I-D lacks 7.5 you got there before me but IANA starts the name with I S I S which as above I think significant in this context. Tom Petch Les > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:05 AM > To: John Scudder <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; lsr- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-00.txt> (IS-IS > Application- > Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard > > From: John Scudder <[email protected]> > Sent: 20 April 2023 13:45 > To: tom petch > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; lsr- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-00.txt> (IS-IS > Application- > Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard > > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for catching this, sorry I missed it in my review. The registry is now > named "IS-IS Sub-TLVs for Application-Specific SRLG TLV", so, > > OLD: > 7.5. Sub-TLVs for TLV 238 Registry > > IANA has created a new registry titled "Sub-TLVs for TLV 238" under > the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" registry to control the assignment of sub- > > NEW: > 7.5. Sub-TLVs for IS-IS Sub-TLVs for Application-Specific SRLG TLV Registry > > IANA has created a new registry titled "IS-IS Sub-TLVs for Application- > Specific SRLG TLV" under > the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" registry to control the assignment of sub- > > Authors, can you please make the revision when you publish the next > version? > > <tp> > John > > I had not got that far:-( My comment was meant to be that there is nothing I > can see on the IANA website with the title > IS-IS TLV Codepoints" > a reference which appears in several places. I think that there are other > inconsistencies but decided to work top down and see what I came up with > and this was at the top. > > Tom Petch > I think hat > > > Thanks, > > -John > > > On Apr 20, 2023, at 6:41 AM, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of The IESG <iesg- > [email protected]> > > Sent: 19 April 2023 21:01 > > To: IETF-Announce > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: [Lsr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-00.txt> (IS-IS > > Application- > Specific Link Attributes) to Proposed Standard > > The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to > > consider the following document: - 'IS-IS Application-Specific Link > > Attributes' > > <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-00.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > [email protected] mailing lists by 2023-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may > > be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the > > beginning > > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > <tp> > > " IANA has created a new registry titled "Sub-TLVs for TLV 238" under > > the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" registry to control the assignment > > " > > > > When I go to the IANA website I see lots of I S - I S under which it might > > be > but not that particular one. What is it by another name? > > > > Tom Petch > > > > Abstract > > > > > > Existing traffic-engineering-related link attribute advertisements > > have been defined and are used in RSVP-TE deployments. Since the > > original RSVP-TE use case was defined, additional applications (e.g., > > Segment Routing Policy and Loop-Free Alternates) that also make use > > of the link attribute advertisements have been defined. In cases > > where multiple applications wish to make use of these link > > attributes, the current advertisements do not support application- > > specific values for a given attribute, nor do they support indication > > of which applications are using the advertised value for a given > > link. This document introduces new link attribute advertisements > > that address both of these shortcomings. > > > > This document obsoletes RFC 8919. > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf- > lsr-rfc8919bis/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H--jQXaGBKyUh1Ji8- > 0I02I_lK5h848xPJFQqyeHphMG17NBjPpu__ABg4byU4qG2GbHgH-66efP5g$ > > > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > [email protected] > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;! > !NEt6yMaO-gk!H--jQXaGBKyUh1Ji8- > 0I02I_lK5h848xPJFQqyeHphMG17NBjPpu__ABg4byU4qG2GbHgH8CiymDMA > $ _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
