Hi! > > Just recently I've found that one of the posix tests stays running > > after > > the testsuite has exited (is reparented to init and runs happily ever > > after). Which is another usecase for this rename. > > > > But the original patch was rather hack (and it doesn't work for me > > anyway). > > > > So what about renaming the sources itself? Do we agree on this? > > I'm not against renaming sources, just thinking if there is less > intrusive way to achieve same result. I believe all Makefiles are generated, > so other option that comes to mind would be to modify > scripts/generate-makefiles.sh. > Any thoughts about this approach?
We can hack the script to generate Makefiles that include the dir name into the binary name which would be less intrusive but on the other hand that would break the rule that foo.c generates foo.run_test... -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
