On 02/12/2013 08:22 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: [email protected] >> To: "Jan Stancek" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Sent: Monday, 11 February, 2013 4:51:11 PM >> Subject: Re: [LTP] open posix testsuite and names of testcases >> >> Hi! >>>> Just recently I've found that one of the posix tests stays >>>> running >>>> after >>>> the testsuite has exited (is reparented to init and runs happily >>>> ever >>>> after). Which is another usecase for this rename. >>>> >>>> But the original patch was rather hack (and it doesn't work for >>>> me >>>> anyway). >>>> >>>> So what about renaming the sources itself? Do we agree on this? >>> >>> I'm not against renaming sources, just thinking if there is less >>> intrusive way to achieve same result. I believe all Makefiles are >>> generated, >>> so other option that comes to mind would be to modify >>> scripts/generate-makefiles.sh. >>> Any thoughts about this approach? >> >> We can hack the script to generate Makefiles that include the dir >> name >> into the binary name which would be less intrusive but on the other >> hand >> that would break the rule that foo.c generates foo.run_test... > > Caspar, Wanlong, any preference / thoughts?
I vote to changing the rule of generating the Makefiles, it's simple and the simple rule change is easy to be accepted. Agree? Thanks, Wanlong Gao > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
