----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > To: "Jan Stancek" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, 11 February, 2013 4:51:11 PM > Subject: Re: [LTP] open posix testsuite and names of testcases > > Hi! > > > Just recently I've found that one of the posix tests stays > > > running > > > after > > > the testsuite has exited (is reparented to init and runs happily > > > ever > > > after). Which is another usecase for this rename. > > > > > > But the original patch was rather hack (and it doesn't work for > > > me > > > anyway). > > > > > > So what about renaming the sources itself? Do we agree on this? > > > > I'm not against renaming sources, just thinking if there is less > > intrusive way to achieve same result. I believe all Makefiles are > > generated, > > so other option that comes to mind would be to modify > > scripts/generate-makefiles.sh. > > Any thoughts about this approach? > > We can hack the script to generate Makefiles that include the dir > name > into the binary name which would be less intrusive but on the other > hand > that would break the rule that foo.c generates foo.run_test...
Caspar, Wanlong, any preference / thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
