Hi! > >>> I'm not against renaming sources, just thinking if there is less > >>> intrusive way to achieve same result. I believe all Makefiles are > >>> generated, > >>> so other option that comes to mind would be to modify > >>> scripts/generate-makefiles.sh. > >>> Any thoughts about this approach? > >> > >> We can hack the script to generate Makefiles that include the dir > >> name > >> into the binary name which would be less intrusive but on the other > >> hand > >> that would break the rule that foo.c generates foo.run_test... > > > > Caspar, Wanlong, any preference / thoughts? > > I vote to changing the rule of generating the Makefiles, it's simple > and the simple rule change is easy to be accepted. Agree?
Ok. I will look into this and hopefully commit a patch soon enough. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
