Thanks for the reply David.

Yes, I assure you we're of course running the i386 -server kernel, allowing
all 8GB to be seen and accessed. The reason we chose 32-bit was because of
that all-encompassing piece of bloat called flash, and others' inability to
get sound working when running the amd64 variant on the server. I know all
about ndiswrapper and its pros and cons, and it would take a lot to
convince me that my users would be happier/more stable with the current FF3
(beta!) running through ndiswrapper.  And, returning to 3GB RAM is not an
option, as this server .. well.. serves quite a few purposes.

If you have references for the 'slowness and other issues' or 'hardware
support issues' I'd love to see them. I've not found any quantitative
analysis of i386+PAE vs. x86_64/amd64 performance. I have to assume that
while there is necessarily some some slowdown in rewriting memory addresses
to access +3GB RAM, it's not so significant that it causes the measured
load average to go up 400%.

-Michael

On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:30:56 -0600, "David Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Michael Blinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> My company recently switched to an i386 Ubuntu 8.04 LTSP server (2
>> quad-core CPUs, 8GB RAM, hardware SCSI RAID) from a K12LTSPv6 x86_64
> server
>> (2 dual-core CPUs, 8GB RAM, hardware SCSI RAID).
> 
> Are you really using the i386 version? Because that's the 32-bit
> version, which is known to cause slowness and other issues on systems
> with lots of RAM (3+ GB). Install Ubuntu x86_64 and try again.
> 
> If you insist on running a 32-bit server then you should consider
> dropping to 3 GB of RAM or install the server kernel, which is
> configured to use more RAM, although less effectively than a 64-bit
> OS, and with potential hardware support issues.
> 
> Peruse this thread on the Ubuntu forums for lots more info and helpful
> links:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751479


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to