On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 16:13 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote: > I'm not saying we don't have another bug with dmrc handling, but > telling people to change LDM_XSESSION on a system that's running an up > to date ldm is just plain wrong and will cause weird bugs that will > take us weeks to figure out. A lot of race conditions in DBUS and the > general desktop tend to happen when you don't call /etc/X11/Xsession.
Acknowledged. (If so, LDM_XSESSION should perhaps be entirely removed.) > I guess it'd be a good idea to have a few of us poke at ldm next week > at the hackfest and see if there's indeed still something wrong with it. You help is greatly appreciated! Thank you. > One thing that worries me a bit looking at my dmrc here is that > lightdm on Oneiric doesn't seem to set the Exec/TryExec keys and its > syntax doesn't seem to be valid either. > So we may actually have a bug because of lightdm generating a broken > .dmrc for users that have the same home directory on LTSP and on a > regular desktop. This is true for our setup. Regards, Rüdiger -- Dr. Ruediger Kupper <[email protected]> Kepler-Gymnasium Freundenstadt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
