to continue with this process :)
Now I have the rockspec below. Is there a naming convention for
binaries? For example the binary in this case is compiled for OSX,
i386. Is there a naming convention for multi-architecture binaries?
I created the following structure
opengl/
opengl-1.0-4258.rockspec
lib/
opengl.so
I then tried luarocks pack opengl/opengl-4258.rockspec , but it went
looking for the project indicated in the src entry of the rockspec.
This seems odd to me because I haven't packed the rock yet, so why
would it look on a server for it? What I'm trying to do is make a
rock from my local folders/files and put that rock online. Is there a
way to do that or do I have to put stuff online first?
thanks,
wes
package = "opengl"
version = "4258"
source = {
url = "http://lua-av.mat.ucsb.edu/luarocks/opengl";,
}
description = {
summary = "OpenGL graphics library",
detailed = [[
OpenGL bindings
]],
}
dependencies = {
"lua >= 5.1"
}
build = {
type = "none",
install = {
lib = {
opengl = "opengl.so"
}
}
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
