2011/6/28 Ignacio Burgueño <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> You can use "luarocks make". It will assume the sources (or the >> binary, in your case) and rockspec are in the current directory and >> will install a rock properly, which you can then "luarocks pack". >> > > Quick question. I was under the impression that luarocks pack on an > installed rock would produce a binary rock and luarocks pack on a rockspec > would produce a source rock.
That's correct! > In this case, it tries to fetch the "sources". Is this because of build.type > = "none" ? I haven't tested it here now, but what I meant was: use "luarocks make" on the rockspec, and then "luarocks pack opengl" to pack the installed rock into a .rock file, just like you suggested in the other message. -- -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ - http://colorbleed.com.br/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
