Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and will let you know how it went.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <[email protected] > wrote: > I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from > commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. I'll > check next time I push something to svn. > > But both of those items have made it to the mirror. > > - michael > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't know how often github mirror is updated. > > These are the original locations > > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ > > 2.9.4g > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ > > 9_4g/ > > > > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. > > > > Thanks, > > DIGY > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On > > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for > > potential > > memory leaks > > > > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I > > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly > > signed patch applied to it? > > > > 2011/9/6 Digy <[email protected]> > > > > > To avoid misunderstanding... > > > > > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > > > > > DIGY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Digy [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > > > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of > testing > > > against all projects using Lucene.Net > > > DIGY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > > > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at > > how > > > RavenDB uses it? > > > > > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > > > ) > > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's > > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. > > > > > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for > > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready > > to > > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some > > tasks > > > > left to take care of? > > > > > > > > ~Prescott > > > > > > > > > >
