Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
Digy can you elaborate on 414 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't seem to resolve the issue brought up Thanks, ~P ---------------------------------------- > From: digyd...@gmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300 > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > +1 for an official release. > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > Hey All, > > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks > left to take care of? > > > > ~Prescott = > ----- > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı. > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011 >
