I see. It is merely a bug fix, and we would be happy to see it in 2.9.4 too - so we can get it from nuget instead of forking it
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, digy digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only > 2.9.4g branch. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 > > DIGY > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com > >wrote: > > > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to > > measure memory usage among other things. > > > > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for > > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See > > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3 > > > > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4? > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and > > > will let you know how it went. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon < > > > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > > > > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from > > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. > > >> I'll > > >> check next time I push something to svn. > > >> > > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror. > > >> > > >> - michael > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated. > > >> > These are the original locations > > >> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ > > >> > 2.9.4g > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ > > >> > 9_4g/ > > >> > > > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > DIGY > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto: > itamar.synhers...@gmail.com > > ] > > >> On > > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM > > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > >> > > > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for > > >> > potential > > >> > memory leaks > > >> > > > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 > > tag > > >> I > > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the > > strongly > > >> > signed patch applied to it? > > >> > > > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding... > > >> > > > > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > >> > > > > >> > > DIGY > > >> > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > >> > > > > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of > > >> testing > > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net > > >> > > DIGY > > >> > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > >> > > > > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a > look > > >> at > > >> > how > > >> > > RavenDB uses it? > > >> > > > > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > > >> > > ) > > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all > > it's > > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. > > >> > > > > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hey All, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it > > for > > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are > > >> ready > > >> > to > > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have > > some > > >> > tasks > > >> > > > left to take care of? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > ~Prescott > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
