ofcource not :), was just wondering why it didn't go through the IX
On 7/28/06, Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Mikisa Richard wrote: > Shouldn't this have gone through the IX? Maybe it's about time we > had the meeting Badru proposed to sort the UIXP issues. But that cannot be the reason why the trace died on the way. -- Hari Kurup _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
-- cheers Richard _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
