On Friday 28 July 2006 16:04, Mikisa Richard wrote:

> Good point but that's assuming that the connectivity to the IX
> is the problem. I believe that's just part of the problem.

My understanding is that some of the members de-peered because of 
congestion issues with local links to other local service 
providers. To moot lack of interest due expensive or unreliable 
high speed circuits, suggest this be treated as a serious issue.

> We 
> need to go back to basics and re-convince 'management' that
> connectivity to the IX is good for us.

This was done already (painstakingly, IIRC), why should we try to 
reinvent the wheel?

> At the moment, it's 
> proving really hard since we don't have any stats to speak of
> despite the fact that the IX has been around or awhile now.

If the exchange point has become unpopular because of technical 
issues (that we are all able to solve), the blame lies with us 
and we should handle the initiative to set things right.

I see little participation from "politicians" on this. This is 
our baby, guys.

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: pgpHXtuQAou8r.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to