-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 10:16, Hari Kurup wrote:
Why would Spacenet "happily host" the IX when they have not
found reason to peer in the first place?
BTW, the issue of location of the IX vs conflict of interest
was thoroughly debated before. It should be in the archives.
Would you be suggesting if the exchange point were to be hosted
with an ISP, only currently peering ISP's be considered?
Certainly not. I was only doubting Richard's "reliable source" at
Spacenet :-)
- --
Hari Kurup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFE0GFPiQIqOIma1OwRAjeVAJ4w/WS2BAhiGKFbsmAvimU206qOAQCfYnmb
qxHFFCK0UWO7zqJ2pSyqyTo=
=lSxh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
