On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:55:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I only managed to get this so far, it's for the high end > boys. It's still useful information anyways
Thanks. Unfortunately, I generally don't rely on information received via vendor comparison tests, because half the time, these tests are paid for - Cisco are especially notorious for this. I've found PoC testing and word-of-mouth to be some of the best avenues for comparing performance. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
