But as you say Renier it is _illegal_ downloading. Just because the
lawyers may be crooked doesn't it still mean that the download is
legal?

On 10/08/2010, Reinier Battenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Would kyle not just be bending the definition just like the IP lawyers are
>  bending the damage caused by illegal downloading to say, 50.000USD per song?
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  rgds,
>
>  Reinier Battenberg
>  Director
>  Mountbatten Ltd.
>  +256 758 801 749
>  www.mountbatten.net
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 10 August 2010 11:32:20 Tim Schofield wrote:
>  > Well Kyle you have a unique definition of theft that I have never come
>  > across before in  my 50 years on this planet.
>  >
>  > If I hack into amazons servers and download the credit card details of
>  > all their customers, the law would say I have stolen that data. I dont
>  > have to remove them, I still have stolen them and I would be charged
>  > with the theft of that data. If you break into someones offices and
>  > take copies of their private information from their filing cabinets,
>  > that is theft.
>  >
>  > it is not archiving, cloning, or any other of the words that have been
>  > used here, it is theft.
>  >
>  > You are the only person on this list arguing that taking something
>  > that does not belong to you without the permission of the owner is not
>  > theft. The argument of the rest of this list is that it is acceptable
>  > practice as they are being robbed by other people as well.
>  >
>  > On 10/08/2010, Kyle Spencer <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > Hey Tim,
>  > >
>  > >  While I respect your position, I refuse to allow us, as a group, to
>  > >  collectively base this discussion on false analogies and appeals to
>  > >  emotion.
>  > >
>  > >  The distinction between "theft" and "unauthorized duplication" is /very/
>  > >  important.
>  > >
>  > >  The YR service is /not/ like stealing a car.  If you steal my car I no
>  > >  longer have it.
>  > >
>  > >  On the other hand, if you walk up to my car and magically make 100
>  > >  copies of it, I still have my car and it has /not/ been stolen.
>  > >
>  > >  I am not arguing whether either one is right, wrong, or has more or less
>  > >  impact than the other.  I only argue that the outcomes of these two
>  > >  actions are very different and should not morally or legally be judged
>  > >  as the same.
>  > >
>  > >  Personally, I think the real interesting questions regarding IP law are:
>  > >
>  > >  If we all have the ability to clone things for free, why should we pay
>  > >  for those things?
>  > >
>  > >  Is it safe to build economies on markets of artificial scarcity?
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  Regards,
>  > >  Kyle Spencer
>  > >
>  > >  ----- Original message -----
>  > >
>  > > > Ok, there are lots of threads within a thread here so let me summarise
>  > > >
>  > >  > the arguments. Please feel free to comment if you do not agree.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > It is a fact that Badru has a site on which he is distributing
>  > >  > copyrighted material that does not belong to him and without the
>  > >  > permission of the owners.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > It is a fact that taking something that does not belong to you without
>  > >  > the permission of the owner is theft.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Badru and others say that this is acceptable as there are other people
>  > >  > who are also stealing from these people so he may as well join in. I
>  > >  > do not agree with this.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > This is a Linux user group. Linux would not exist without copyright
>  > >  > law. If people in the rest of the world do not respect copyright law,
>  > >  > the software we all enjoy will disappear.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > It is not ok to portray this as the developing world against the
>  > >  > developed world. Other developing countries including the rest of EAC
>  > >  > are trying to respect the rights of copyright holders. Why can't
>  > >  > Uganda.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > These are hard working creative artists and programmers that you are
>  > >  > agreeing it is acceptable to steal from.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > This summarisesz my position I think.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > --
>  > >  > WebERP Africa Ltd
>  > >  > +447710427049
>  > >  > +256752963327
>  > >  > +255784602561
>  > >  > www.weberpafrica.com
>  > > >
>  > > > _______________________________________________
>  > > >
>  > >  > LUG mailing list
>  > >  > [email protected]
>  > >  > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>  > >  >
>  > >  > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>  > >  >
>  > >  > All Archives can be found at
>  > >  > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>  > >  >
>  > >  > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
>  > >  > (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible
>  > >  > for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
>  _______________________________________________
>  LUG mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
>  LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
>  All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
>  The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
>  ---------------------------------------
>
>


-- 
WebERP Africa Ltd
+447710427049
+256752963327
+255784602561
www.weberpafrica.com
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to