Tim, i think you have good intentions, but ignorance is no defense. i read the link Paul quoted.
and that link highlighted the Oracle versus Google suit. But it did not contain the full details of the suit. Now if you had read the suit, you would have got a rich picture or better understanding. your knowledge was limited to a blog post (God gracious) Which is exactly what am talking about. People dial in to a talk show with little or no knowledge about the subject on the table. To be honest, i dont care why you highlighted "Patents and Copyrights are different beats" and i ll restate, every man and his dog, knows the difference and allow me to conclude: 1. The fact is that this case is about Patents and Copyright infringement. 2. If someone starts a thread, then s/he is free to provide additional sources 3. If i respond to a thread, in this case i stated (item 1), am under no obligation to provide my sources, especially if a teenager, can get this information in 5 minutes enjoy your weekend
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
