So let me get this straight Cavin,
you have pulled out your do-not-discuss-without-researching stick to
beat up Tim because he mentioned that this case is about patents while
you who read the suit with all the *richer* detail that it provides
caught the bit that said patents *and copyright*?
Well out of curiosity I actually skimmed the law suit and the first
seven (7) out of the eight counts refer to patents and the last one (1)
talks about copyright infringement. So perhaps one blogger (i guess in
your world of rigorous research blogs are irrelevant sources of
information) might be forgiven for thinking that since 7 out of 8 issues
refer to patents, then the case is overwhelmingly about patents.
I actually don't think you are rude, just pompous.. if I had a choice,
give me a rude person any day.
Mugarura Cavin wrote:
Tim,
i think you have good intentions, but ignorance is no defense.
i read the link Paul quoted.
and that link highlighted the Oracle versus Google suit. But it did not
contain the full details of the suit.
Now if you had read the suit, you would have got a rich picture or
better understanding.
your knowledge was limited to a blog post (God gracious)
Which is exactly what am talking about. People dial in to a talk show
with little or no knowledge about the subject on the table.
To be honest, i dont care why you highlighted "Patents and Copyrights
are different beats"
and i ll restate, every man and his dog, knows the difference
and allow me to conclude:
1. The fact is that this case is about Patents and Copyright infringement.
2. If someone starts a thread, then s/he is free to provide additional
sources
3. If i respond to a thread, in this case i stated (item 1), am under no
obligation to provide my sources, especially if a teenager, can get this
information in 5 minutes
enjoy your weekend
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
