Tend to agree with you. Some chap attempts to come to Oracle's defense:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/why-oracle-was-right-sue-google-392-1 But then promptly gets slapped around in the comments section. P. On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:43, Gerald Begumisa wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Simon Vass <[email protected]> wrote: > but it is not a great message to send. why did they wait until android was > overtaking the iphone to sue? > > The potential pay-off is bigger if the product is successful. > > I think litigation is an official line of business in companies of such sizes > - especially regarding copyright / patent infringement. Normally they won't > bother you if your company (or the product itself) is still small. Why shut > you down now when you could potentially earn them $Xmillion if they let you > develop the product for 5 more years? > > Regards, > Gerald > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- >
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
