On Feb 01, 2007 13:48 -0500, John R. Dunning wrote: > > From: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:45:17 -0700 > > > > On Feb 01, 2007 10:18 -0500, John R. Dunning wrote: > > > I've been hiding in a cave hacking lnd code, and haven't paid much > > > attention > > > to this list lately. I'm about to embark on a 2.6.18 vanilla effort. > > > Last I > > > heard, there were problems reported with using the stock 2.6.18 vanilla > > > patchset; something about mballoc not working right. > > > > > > What's the current state of the art with kernel patches for 2.6.18 (or > > > later) > > > vanilla kernels? If anybody has hints or amended patches, they'd be much > > > appreciated. Thanks in advance... > > > > Wait a week for 1.4.9 to be released, and it will have 99% of the changes > > needed for 2.6.18 to work. > > Will that stuff apply equally to lustre 1.6?
Yes, the kernels are the same between 1.4 and 1.6. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
