On 2/8/07, John R. Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:36:11 -0700
On Feb 01, 2007 13:48 -0500, John R. Dunning wrote:
> > From: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:45:17 -0700
> >
> > On Feb 01, 2007 10:18 -0500, John R. Dunning wrote:
> > > I've been hiding in a cave hacking lnd code, and haven't paid
much attention
> > > to this list lately. I'm about to embark on a 2.6.18 vanilla
effort. Last I
> > > heard, there were problems reported with using the stock 2.6.18vanilla
> > > patchset; something about mballoc not working right.
> > >
> > > What's the current state of the art with kernel patches for
2.6.18 (or later)
> > > vanilla kernels? If anybody has hints or amended patches,
they'd be much
> > > appreciated. Thanks in advance...
> >
> > Wait a week for 1.4.9 to be released, and it will have 99% of the
changes
> > needed for 2.6.18 to work.
>
> Will that stuff apply equally to lustre 1.6?
Yes, the kernels are the same between 1.4 and 1.6.
What's the prognosis on 1.4.9? Still expected this week? If not, perhaps
someone at cfs would be kind enough to send me just the kernel-patches
part of
it?
John:
If you could kindly keep us (or me directly) in the loop regarding
2.6.18patches it would be much appreciated.
Trying to build 1.4.9 on debian etch here.
Thanks,
--
Mustafa A. Hashmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
