I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 1.6.5.1
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the > remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data > corruption? > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Brian J. Murrell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 07:41 +0700, sd a wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When is release date for 1.6.6? >> >> I think I already answered today that I don't know when 1.6.6 will be >> released because for the most part, nobody does. >> >> We don't make release date promises or predictions because we don't even >> know the date until the QA cycle for a release candidate is complete in >> which case the release date is for all intents and purposes that day -- >> the overhead for getting packages from QA to the SDLC, etc. aside. >> >> Each and every release candidate that goes to QA has the potential to be >> the GA release. It also has the potential to not be. That's QA doing >> it's job for you. :-) >> >> b. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
