!.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center. J.D. Wojciech Turek wrote: > I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 > servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new lustre > version. I noticed that some people talk about testing beta version > of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc version of 1.6.6 ? > > Many thanks, > > Mag Gam wrote: >> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem >> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems >> aren't occuring anymore! >> >> Thanks again >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 11, 2008 12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >>> >>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 1.6.5.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the >>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data >>>>> corruption? >>>>> >>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our >>> QA process. In general there should never be any chance of data corruption >>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there >>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would explicitly >>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time. >>> >>> Cheers, Andreas >>> -- >>> Andreas Dilger >>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group >>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
