I will check on this and see why it was not sent. J.D. Wojciech Turek wrote: > Indeed you right! I used to get messages from lustre-announce list > about such events but it seems it didn't work this time. > > Thanks > > JD Neumann wrote: >> !.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center. >> J.D. >> >> Wojciech Turek wrote: >>> I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 >>> servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new >>> lustre version. I noticed that some people talk about testing beta >>> version of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc >>> version of 1.6.6 ? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Mag Gam wrote: >>>> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem >>>> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems >>>> aren't occuring anymore! >>>> >>>> Thanks again >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Oct 11, 2008 12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running >>>>>> 1.6.5.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the >>>>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data >>>>>>> corruption? >>>>>>> >>>>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our >>>>> QA process. In general there should never be any chance of data >>>>> corruption >>>>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there >>>>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would >>>>> explicitly >>>>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, Andreas >>>>> -- >>>>> Andreas Dilger >>>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group >>>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
