Indeed you right! I used to get messages from lustre-announce list about such events but it seems it didn't work this time.
Thanks JD Neumann wrote: > !.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center. > J.D. > > Wojciech Turek wrote: >> I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 >> servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new lustre >> version. I noticed that some people talk about testing beta version >> of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc version of >> 1.6.6 ? >> >> Many thanks, >> >> Mag Gam wrote: >>> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem >>> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems >>> aren't occuring anymore! >>> >>> Thanks again >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Oct 11, 2008 12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> >>>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running >>>>> 1.6.5.1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the >>>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data >>>>>> corruption? >>>>>> >>>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our >>>> QA process. In general there should never be any chance of data >>>> corruption >>>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there >>>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would >>>> explicitly >>>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time. >>>> >>>> Cheers, Andreas >>>> -- >>>> Andreas Dilger >>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group >>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
