On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 16:02 +0100, Papp Tamás wrote: 
> 
> *Jaunty + b1_8* -> failure

Just now, I checked out a b1_8, added the following target to
build/autoMakefile.am.toplevel:

debs:
        lversion=$$(sed -ne 's/^#define VERSION "\(.*\)"$$/\1/p' config.h); \
        cversion=$$(sed -ne '1s/^lustre (\(.*\)-[0-9][0-9]*).*$$/\1/p' 
debian/changelog); \
        if [ "$$lversion" != "$$cversion" ]; then \
                echo -e "1i\nlustre ($$lversion-1) unstable; urgency=low\n\n  * 
Automated changelog entry update\n\n -- Brian J. Murrell 
<[email protected]>  $$(date -R)\n\n.\nwq" | ed debian/changelog; \
        fi
        dpkg-buildpackage || { \
                [ $${PIPESTATUS[0]} != 1 ] && exit $${PIPESTATUS[0]}; \
                true; \
        }
        export KPKG_DEST_DIR="$$(pwd)/.."; \
        version=$$(sed -ne '1s/^lustre (\(.*\)).*$$/\1/p' debian/changelog); \
        rm -rf modules-deb; \
        mkdir modules-deb; \
        cd modules-deb; \
        dpkg -x ../../lustre-source_$${version}_all.deb $$(pwd); \
        mkdir usr_src/; \
        tar -C usr_src/ -xjvf usr/src/lustre.tar.bz2; \
        chmod 755 usr_src/modules/lustre/debian/rules; \
        m-a build $${KVERS:+-l $$KVERS} -i -u $$(pwd) lustre

(which I'm going to put into bug 19721 now that I've tested it out)

(and of course had the below mentioned patch applied)

and simply did "make debs" and I got as a result:

-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian    744580 2009-10-30 17:18 
liblustre_1.8.1.52-1_i386.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian    501264 2009-10-30 17:17 
linux-patch-lustre_1.8.1.52-1_all.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian       821 2009-10-30 17:16 lustre_1.8.1.52-1.dsc
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian      3037 2009-10-30 17:18 
lustre_1.8.1.52-1_i386.changes
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian  14277672 2009-10-30 17:16 lustre_1.8.1.52-1.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian  16493170 2009-10-30 17:24 
lustre-client-modules-2.6.28-11-generic_1.8.1.52-1_i386.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian   5111928 2009-10-30 17:18 
lustre-dev_1.8.1.52-1_i386.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian  11845920 2009-10-30 17:18 
lustre-source_1.8.1.52-1_all.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian   1097240 2009-10-30 17:18 
lustre-tests_1.8.1.52-1_i386.deb
-rw-r--r--  1 brian brian    693990 2009-10-30 17:18 
lustre-utils_1.8.1.52-1_i386.deb

> /usr/src/lustre-b1_8/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c:422: error: unknown 
> field âprepare_writeâ specified in initializer
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /usr/src/lustre-b1_8/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c:422: error: 
> initialization from incompatible pointer type
> /usr/src/lustre-b1_8/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c:423: error: unknown 
> field âcommit_writeâ specified in initializer
> /usr/src/lustre-b1_8/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c:423: error: 
> initialization from incompatible pointer type

Yeah.  You need the patch in attachment 26155 in bug 20451.  I am still
waiting for an inspection to get it landed.

b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to