On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:03 +0100, Papp Tamás wrote: > > It's working for mee too, but without liblustre.
Meaning you disabled liblustre just because you don't want it, or that it failed to build for you? It built here fine. > BTW I think it should not depend on linux-headers-generic, but > linux-headers, should? Well, on Ubuntu at least, linux-headers-generic is a virtual package that depends on the latest versioned linux-headers. i.e.: $ apt-cache depends linux-headers-generic linux-headers-generic Depends: linux-headers-2.6.28-16-generic There is no linux-headers package in Ubuntu. Granted this is a Ubuntuism, but I don't have a Debian system here to test any changes for portability. Is your suggestion specific to Debian? Ahhhh. In my development tree, I in fact have the following patch: @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> Uploaders: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> Standards-Version: 3.8.3 -Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, automake, libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, linux-headers-generic | linux-headers, rsync +Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, automake1.7, libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, linux-headers-generic, rsync Homepage: http://www.lustre.org/ Vcs-Cvs: -d :pserver:[email protected]:/lustre Probably this needs to get landed. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
