On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 13:25 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On 2009-11-02, at 11:41, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > Ahhhh. In my development tree, I in fact have the following patch: > > > > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > > Maintainer: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> > > Uploaders: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> > > Standards-Version: 3.8.3 > > -Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, > > automake, libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, > > linux-headers-generic | linux-headers, rsync > > +Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, > > automake1.7, libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, > > linux-headers-generic, rsync > > > You mean the reverse of this should land, right? Lustre doesn't > depend on automake1.7 specifically (it can work on any version up to > 1.10).
Yeah. I thought I pasted in the properly directionalized patch. I know I did make it because I had to correct the first one I pasted. Maybe I pasted it and then erroneously deleted it thinking I was deleting the wrong one. In any case, yes, the reverse of that patch. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
