On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:03 +0100, Papp Tamás wrote: 
> 
> It's working for mee too, but without liblustre.

Meaning you disabled liblustre just because you don't want it, or that
it failed to build for you?  It built here fine.

> BTW I think it should not depend on linux-headers-generic, but 
> linux-headers, should?

Well, on Ubuntu at least, linux-headers-generic is a virtual package
that depends on the latest versioned linux-headers.  i.e.:

$ apt-cache depends linux-headers-generic
linux-headers-generic
  Depends: linux-headers-2.6.28-16-generic

There is no linux-headers package in Ubuntu.  Granted this is a
Ubuntuism, but I don't have a Debian system here to test any changes for
portability.  Is your suggestion specific to Debian?

Ahhhh.  In my development tree, I in fact already have the following
patch:

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>
 Uploaders: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>
 Standards-Version: 3.8.3
-Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, automake1.7, 
libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, linux-headers-generic, 
rsync
+Build-Depends: libreadline-dev, debhelper (>=5.0.0), dpatch, automake, 
libsnmp-dev, bzip2, quilt, texlive-latex-recommended, linux-headers-generic | 
linux-headers, rsync
 Homepage: http://www.lustre.org/
 Vcs-Cvs: -d :pserver:[email protected]:/lustre
 
b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to