> I think a lot of the Lutes we use today are overly large. When my Lute was > built, the first efforts of a friend and myself at doing this, it was > decided, after looking at a lot of "Iconography", that the Lutes represented > were quite a bit smaller than those popular today. This conclusion was > reached after making measurements of the instruments depicted and comparing > them to the size of the faces of the people shown playing them. > Understanding that the human face has a rather average size over all, it was > decided that the Lutes in these paintings were for the most part in the > 50cm-55cm range and not what we call average today, being around 60cm. So you went for a bonsai lute.......................... RT ______________ Roman M. Turovsky http://turovsky.org http://polyhymnion.org
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) G.R. Crona
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) David Van Edwards
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Ed Durbrow
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Michael Thames
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Vance Wood
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Vance Wood
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Roman Turovsky
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Michael Thames
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Vance Wood
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) G.R. Crona
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Roman Turovsky
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Daniel F Heiman
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Ed Durbrow
- Re: Iconography (was:The Right Hand Revisited) Ed Durbrow
