Hello Anthony,

My rather intemperate comments weren't specifically about Susato, which I
would imagine doesn't have a lute part anyway, but about the way in which
the lute part has been simply left out from the many pieces which *do* have
one - Dowland songs, Lachrimae etc -  which I find a huge shame.

Many of the other pieces in the Hendricks collection have been rewritten,
for example the four-part Arbeau settings - the originals have just a melody
- and the consort lessons.  I don't know who the SCA are, and of course they
can do what they like in arranging music for their dances, but we should be
cautious in using this material.

P


On 19/04/2008, Anthony Hind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Wayne for your help which seems to have clarified the issue. I am
> sure this article would be of interest to Stephen K. also.
>
> David, there seems to have been much scholarly discussion on the issue of
> his birth place, so there is good reason for there to have been doubts.
> Your supposition was entirely logical, and this obliged me to look for
> clarification, and with Wayne's help, a likely good conclusion.
> I  for one learnt something in the process.
>
> However, for a moment, thinking about the recent subject raised by Rob, I
> wondered whether I had been the victim of bad Web reporting that I had taken
> for granted.
> Already, Peter Martin told me that I had sent Stephen K. a "bowdlerized"
> lute-neutered version of Mille Ducas (although, to be fair, it was the only
> one I found), and
> then I feared I had further lead the list astray. It is always best to
> check and recheck, and to add a note of caution in a message when one is not
> fairly certain of the facts,
> I just sent the quote, without the note of caution, so in that I was also
> both right and wrong. Fortunately it seems we have come nearer to the facts,
> until further research, perhaps
> puts this in question again.
> Best wishes to all
> Anthony
>
> Le 19 avr. 08 =E0 02:21, wayne cripps a ecrit :
>
> Hi Anthony -
> >
> >  The article s long, and a series f jpegs, but this covers Susato's
> > birth..
> >
> >        Wayne
> >
> >
> > <dtc.20.tif.gif><dtc.21.tif.gif><dtc.22.tif.gif><dtc.23.tif.gif><dtc.24.tif.gif>
> > On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Anthony Hind wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Le 19 avr. 08 =E0 00:50, LGS-Europe a ecrit :
> > >
> > >  Susato was born in  Cologne
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I read he was born is Soest (The Netherlands), hence his name.
> > > >
> > >
> > > David you may well be correct, but I saw this.
> > > JSTOR: New Documents on the Life of Tielman Susato, Sixteenth ...
> > > http://www.jstor.org/pss/3687153
> > > New evidence confirms that Tielman Susato was born in Cologne or its
> > > environs, in about 1515, as the son of another Tielman. Three
> > > documents can be cited to ...
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > JSTOR: The Cantus-Firmus Chansons of Tylman Susato
> > > http://www.jstor.org/pss/830473 - [ Traduire cette page ]
> > > Finally, we shall attempt to determine the extent of Gervaise's
> > > stylistic debt to Susato. Tylman Susato,2 who was probably born in
> > > Cologne, settled in Ant- ...
> > >
> > > There are people born in England called French, it is no guarantee of
> > > their origin, and the father who could have been born in Soest, might
> > > have moved to Cologne.
> > > However, I don't know. These articles look serious, but I have no way
> > > of accessing them. Do check what they have to say, and let us know.
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ****************************
> > > > David van Ooijen
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > www.davidvanooijen.nl
> > > > ****************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To get on or off this list see list information at
> > > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Peter Martin
Belle Serre
La Caulie
81100 Castres
France
tel: 0033 5 63 35 68 46
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.silvius.co.uk
http://absolute81.blogspot.com/
www.myspace.com/sambuca999
www.myspace.com/chuckerbutty

--

Reply via email to