That's exactly what it says- that it is abhorrent/abominable, and that it is suitable for and thus done on lutes.
RT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Kirnberger on lutes and temperament



That doesn't seem to be what the translation says.


--- On Sat, 26/4/08, Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Kirnberger on lutes and temperament
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Markus Lutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Lute Net" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, 26 April, 2008, 4:04 PM
K. means to say that nonET is for keyboards, not for lutes.
RT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martyn Hodgson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Markus Lutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Lute Net" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 10:52 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Kirnberger on lutes and temperament


>
>
>
>   Thank you for this Markus (and Roman),
>
>
>   But he seems to be contradicting himself by starting
out condemning
>   equa= l temperament and ending by saying it is the
only one which works
>   on every = string.  Is this really what he's
saying?
>
>
>   MH
>   --- On Sat, 26/4/08, Markus Lutz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>= ; wrote:
>
>     From: Markus Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     Subject= : [LUTE] Re: Kirnberger on lutes and
temperament
>     To: "Lutelist" <lute=
@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>     Date: Saturday, 26 April, 2008, 3:25 PM
>     > Die gleichschwebende Temperatur ist >
schlechterdings ganz
>     verwerflich, nur in diesem Fall nothwendig zu >
verstehen, um die
>     Bande einer Theorbe, Laute oder solcher ahnlicher
> Instrumente als
>     Psalter, Zitter u. s. w. recht zu legen, weil eine
> Temperatur
>     ausser dieser Art jeder Seite ihr Recht nicht
thut."" Equal
>     temperament is completely condemnable and only has
to be=20
>     understood necessarily, to lay the ties of a
theorbo, lute or
>     such=20 similar instruments as psalterium, cither
etc. correctly,
>     because any=20 other temperature won't be able
to do right to every
>     string. Best Markus Roman Turovsky schrieb: >
"Da die Logarithmen
>     fur die meisten Musikanten Bohmische Dorfer sind,
> ohnerachtet sie
>     bei der Musik wenig oder gar keinen Nutzen
schaffen, s= o=20 > ist
>     es nach meinem Sinn, auch deutlicher, sich durch
bekannte=20 >
>     Rechnungsart auszudrucken. Die gleichschwebende
Temperatur ist=20 >
>     schlechterdings ganz verwerflich, nur in diesem
Fall nothwendig
>     zu=20 > verstehen, um die Bande einer Theorbe,
Laute oder solcher
>     ahnlicher=20 > Instrumente als Psalter, Zitter
u. s. w. recht zu
>     legen, weil eine=20 > Temperatur ausser dieser
Art jeder Seite ihr
>     Recht nicht thut."" >=20 >
Mathias, can we translate this
>     politely?[;-))) > RT >=20 >=20 >=20
> To get on or off this list see
>     list information at >
>
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>   =0A
>
__________________________________________________________________
>
>   =0ASent from Yahoo= ! Mail.=0A
>   =0AA Smarter Email.
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>



_______________________________________________________
Get your own customized domain and email for $8.95/1-yr
Offer ends soon. Only at http://www.doteasypromo.com/e


     __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html




_______________________________________________________
Get your own customized domain and email for $8.95/1-yr
Offer ends soon. Only at http://www.doteasypromo.com/e


Reply via email to