I can't remember if I've said this on the list already, but my
   professional sound engineer uncle had suggested to me that I apply an
   "inverted smile" equalizer setting to the lute music I record with
   smaller, inferior mics. Interestingly, I  had the chance to have a
   professional classical sound engineer record me playing my baroque lute
   a few months ago, first with my mic, then with his $1000 mic and then
   with his $10,000 mike. The results were stunningly different (now I
   wish I had sold some stock and bought that mic!!!!). If however I use
   that "inverted smile" it brings the inferior recording at least in the
   general direction of the best mic. By inverted smile I mean dropping 31
   Hz and 16 kHz down to about 10%, 63 Hz and 8 kHz by 50% and keeping the
   others flat or slightly bumped. Since this seems to bring the recorded
   sound closer to the 'real" sound, I haven't felt that it was unfairly
   enhancing my performance, but rather compensating a bit for inferior
   recording technology. I'll try applying to Rob's file and send him the
   results.
   Danny

   On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Anthony Hind
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

     Rob
         I have not managed to listen to your recording yet, so my reply
     does not relate to it,
     but to the questions that seem to be raised about reverb and MP3.
     Couldn't the problem be that reverb is "blind", giving all your
     notes a sort of equal sustain, while what
     you really want, is a mike that allows you to record the smallest
     whisper of the lute, so that
     we hear the notes you played with sustain, slowly dying into the
     background (while the others stop quickly), as you actually played
     them.
     I fear that even if you had the mike (and perhaps those in the H2
     are good enough),
     the MP3 format most probably squashes the subtle low level dynamic
     differences, so that all notes seem to die fairly quickly.
     Adding reverb to that would probably just give all notes more
     sustain without distinction, and blur your performance.
     Perhaps, it is better not to try to hide the MP3 problems, doing so
     may further confuse the listener, even if the brut MP3
     sounds rather dry. However, I have not experimented with MP3, while
     both Davids have much experience is in this area,
     and Martin also does quite a good job with his H2.
     Anthony

   --

References

   1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to