--- On Tue, 17/2/09, Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Theorbo by Nic. Nic. B. van der Waals for
     sale
     To: "David Rastall" <[email protected]>
     Date: Tuesday, 17 February, 2009, 8:30 AM

   That it is not a historic definition is precisely why it appears in
   inverted commas (as in 'toy' theorbos)

   In fact not just me who uses 'toy': for example Lynda Sayce.

   Historically single re-entrant theorboes were not uncommon (eg  England
   in the 17thC) and are no less theorboes for not requiring both top
   courses to be at the lower octave.

   MH
   --- On Mon, 16/2/09, David Rastall <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: David Rastall <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Theorbo by Nic. Nic. B. van der Waals for
     sale
     To: [email protected]
     Cc: "lutelist Net" <[email protected]>
     Date: Monday, 16 February, 2009, 8:27 PM

   On Feb 16, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

      A small theorbo is called a 'toy' theorbo when, because of its

      relatively small size

   As I recall, "toy" is your own appellation, rather than some general
   historical definition.

   which only really requires the first course to be

      at the lower octave,  the second is also unnecessarily lowered: it's

      all down to  how the individual player strings it,  not some
   inherent

      characteristic of the instrument itself.

   You're saying that size brings about the necessity to use double
   reentrant tuning.  But that's not to say that people with smaller
   instruments do it "unnecessarily."  I'm sure many of us (myself
   included) do it because of the way double reentrant tuning sounds.  My
   theorbo is small enough at 79cm on the fretboard to use single
   reentrant tuning, but I personally prefer the sound of double reentrant
   over single.  With single reentrant there's too much second-string
   sound, at least in my mind anyway.  Besides, double reentrant provides
   the characteristic uniqueness of the theorbo!  It's what makes a
   theorbo a theorbo, regardless of size.  I can tune my 10-course in
   double reentrant if I want to.  That would truly be a "toy" theorbo!
   Davidr
   [1][email protected]

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to