On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:37 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote: > If we have any pretensions to 'Historically Informed Performance'
Do you think we're all being "pretentious"? > it is > clearly daft to ignore historic precedent and practice. It's impossible to be 100% historical about anything. Besides, the great variety of historical lutes-like instruments, and the radical changes that occurred in lute history, tell me that people were just as daft back then. Davidr dlu...@verizon.net -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
