I'm recording sound on separate device (zoom H2) as integrated mics on the
camera aren't good enough, but I'm using wave files coming out the zoom
without any treatment, no reverb or any ehancement. The only editing I'm
doing is to cut edges and add titles, and have a fade out at the end on
sound file (but often sound is already over) All my vids are "one shot" (not
the first one, I make some takes (many...) and keep the one I think is the
best (or the not worst... )
So what you hear is what you see and vice versa.
Perhaps I should add some reverb to make my vids more "pro" but it is not my
aim, neither my taste. The only reverb I like is when recording in a natural
reverbing place (church...)
Val ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David van Ooijen" <[email protected]>
To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 10:35 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: The End of the Golden Age
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:37 PM, wikla <[email protected]> wrote:
I think from the start people tweaked the audio-bit. What you see is
not what you hear.
How can you do that? My tiny digital camera doesn't have a very good
..
steep to me; I cannot imagine how to replace the sound track. Perhaps
better so?
In a way, yes.
What I do, and others too, is record the audio track on a seperate
device, and only synchronise it with the video after editing/adding
reverb/whatever. Another option is to seperate the audio from the
video, treat it and then reconnect it.
All those bedrooms that sound like churches, never wondered about that?
David
--
*******************************
David van Ooijen
[email protected]
www.davidvanooijen.nl
*******************************
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
