Hi, Bruno, I've coincidentally been reacquainting myself with "IHK" recently and I'd personally go for double staff transcription, mainly since I assume most music profs, having at least some piano, are more comfortable with it. I agree that transcription of Kapsperger for guitar would be tricky since the low basses are pretty integral. However, there are a lot of Weiss transcriptions that guitarists seem perfectly happy with...
Best, and good luck! Chris. >>> Bruno Correia <[email protected]> 1/6/2010 9:46 AM >>> Could anybody give his/her opinion about this issue: At the moment I am analysing the Kapsperger 1611 lute book for my Doc. dissertation. All the musical examples will be written with Django tab writer adding (automatically) its transcription. My question is: should the transcription be written on a single or double staff (treble and bass clefs)? I think that a single staff is more economical... I thought for a moment to transcribe it in (e) in order to easy the access to guitarists, but perhaps its just a fool idea. After all they don't have the deep basses (10 course). Appreciate any comments. -- To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute
